http://blogues.lapresse.ca/hetu/2017/10 ... eur%C2%BB/
Le contexte à Fox News Radio, pas le Washington Post.
https://radio.foxnews.com/2017/10/17/pr ... -tax-cuts/
'' KILMEADE: One of the questions was about writing the Green Berets soldiers and ends up being a bigger story. Can I ask you what you thought about when you brought up past presidents and what they've done? Do you want to clarify anything?
TRUMP: Well, there's nothing to clarify because if you look at my whole (ph) this was again fake news CNN. I mean, they're just a bunch of fakers. So, they asked me that questions and for the most part to the best of my knowledge I think I've called every family of somebody that's died and it's the hardest call to make. And I said it very loud and clear yesterday. The hardest thing for me to do is do that. Now, as far as other representatives, I don't know. I mean, you could ask General Kelly did he get a call from Obama. You could ask other people, I don't know what Obama's policy was. I write letters and I also call.
Now, sometimes if you had a tragic event with - it's very difficult to be able to do that. But I have called, I believe everybody but certainly I'll use the word virtually everybody where during the last nine months something's happened to us all. I've called virtually everybody. I've gone to Dover. I've seen what takes place at Dover.
It's an incredible scene and very, very sad. One of the saddest things you'll ever see. But I really speak for myself. I'm not speaking for other people. I don't know what Bush did, I don't know what Obama did. You could find out easily what President Obama did. All you have to do is ask the military people but I believe his policy was somewhat different than my policy.
I can tell you my policy is I've called every one of them. And, you have to let a little time go by. You can't just call immediately but I will be calling, have called and will be calling the parents and the loved ones, wives, et cetera of the soldiers that recently were killed.
KILMEADE: No, I meant seeing (ph) you happy?
TRUMP: I love doing it. I'm getting tremendous support even in your polls I'm getting tremendous support and it's hard to believe I can get support when you have so many phony stories out there. Like, CNN, like MSNBC, like NBC. NBC is probably worse than CNN. But all I know is FOX is good. FOX, we love you, FOX.
KILMEADE: We're fair.
TRUMP: You are fair. (... ) ''
Contexte d'une entrevue très partisane. L'autre bord cela ne serait pas mieux, ce ne sont pas des vérificateurs-comptables, ce sont des journalistes biaisés de ''gauche'' pour la majorité , gauche du contexte actuel et aussi les anti-Trump versus la droite et souvent populiste et pro-Trump.
Si tu veux la vérité, tu ne dois absolument pas lire cela mot à mot. Tu dois lire entre les lignes, les émotions, la partisanerie et tout.
Et si tu travailles comme auditeur, tu dois supposer l'honnêteté à moins de changer de rôle, tu vas travailler pour la police et tu en deviens un toi-même ou tu es un spécialiste qui travaille avec eux spécialiste de la fraude et autres crimes économiques. La personne n'est pas coupable mais vous, vous enquêtez et ce que vous pensez, ce sont des hypothèses de travail à confirmer.
Pas vrai que Fox est fair & balance et pas du tout le Washington Post, aucunement Richard Hétu. Aucun au Québec. Pour les profs de marketing HEC ou UQAM, ils se dissocient de la politique pour ramener cela juste sur le plan du marketing et là ce que Trump a pu faire en campagne ils en tirent des leçons sur le plan de l'efficacité.
D'autres textes de d'autres revues mais plus tôt en campagne étaient plus nuancés et toujours political aside... Ce que tu peux imiter chez lui comme principe et ce que tu ne devrais pas faire aussi.